Tuesday, December 27, 2011

2011 Year End Sumo Power Rankings

2011 Year End Sumo Power Rankings

Another year is in the books, sumo-wise, and what a year it was: more scandals, the March tournament was cancelled (hence the x in the ratings), the May tournament was reclassified as a "technical examination", yet more scandals, one ozeki mercifully retired and two rikishi with questionable credentials were promoted to ozeki. Sumo fever -- catch it.

The one positive constant this year has been, once again, Hakuho. He's so dominant that I've invented a new word to describe him. Hakuho is the "transcender", the one who transcends. I've used somewhat more prosaic descriptions for the remainder of the rikishi. Without further ado, here is the power rating list for 2011.

Average                                1/11        x     5/11   7/11   9/11   11/11

            The Transcender

128  Hakuho                        150         x      121     108     118     145    

            The Contenders (Close to the Top)

105  Kotoshogiku               101        x        87     131     111      95    

98  Baruto                             83         x        90       96        99    120
95  Harumafuji                     65         x      109    142        73      85    

94  Kakuryu                           86         x      113    102        81      86                

92 Kisenosato                       84         x        81    108       101     85    

            The Pretenders (Not Quite There)

72  Kotooshu                      95           x        29**87         6**  70       

68  Goeido                          64           x      103    41       46       85

65  Okinoumi                     38           x        77     77       76       58      

64  Toyonoshima              63           x        33     75       58       89      

            The Defenders (Middle Class)
54  Homasho                      67          x       40       42       95       25

49  Tochiozan                     56          x       45       34       60       32** 

            The Upenders -- Occasionally (Blue Collar Workers or Shirkers)

42  Takekaze                      30         x      59       47       36       37      

41  Yoshikaze                     24         x      46       49       58       28                              

40  Tochinoshin                 20         x      71       47       49       11      
39  Tochinowaka             [12]        x      18       24       30       64      

39  Aran                              52         x       46       47      24      25
37  Kitataiki                       32          x       33       18      35      38      

36  Myogiryu                     --           x        --       [11]   [13]     36      
35  Aminishiki                   51          x       43       10      29      41      

35  Shohozan                    --            x        --         [7]   [11]     35      
35  Wakakoyu                   28          x       29        54     20      44      

32  Wakanosato               30          x       37        48      39        6**              
32  Aioyama                     [[4]]        x      [[5]]       [7]   [10]**32                                          

31  Kyokutenho               26          x        29         18     42      38      

30  Miyabiyama               19         x        21         32      28      51      

            The Rear Enders (The Lower Rung)

26  Gagamaru                     18         x        24       19      57      12      

26  Tamawashi                   50         x        30       19      20      12                  

25  Toyohibiki                     26         x        29       23      19      30                              

25  Takayasu                       [9]         x        [8]       24      24      28                                          

24  Daido                              [9]         x        [8]       17      25      30                                          

24  Fujiazuma                      [8]         x        [9]       26      20      27                                          

24  Shotenro                       26       x          17         24      30      **      

            The Descenders (Demotions Waiting to Happen)
24  Tokitenku                     22         x         24        30       22      20                  

23  Kaisei                             [8]        x         29        32       15      16  
                                        
22  Sadanofuji                    [6]         x         [5]       [9]        [8]    22                                            

20  Sagatsukasa                [[5]]       x       [13]       25       19      16 
                             
20  Asasekiryu                   25          x         23        20       17      15      

Friday, December 23, 2011

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (Kyushu 2011 edition)

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (Kyushu 2011)

My previous blog dealt with the rikishi who had the best performances power ranking-wise at Kyushu. This blog looks at the rikishi who turned in good (forward moving) sumo, bad (henka) sumo, and ugly (non-forward moving sumo) .

The rikish who produced the best forward moving sumo totals at Kyushu are:

The Good
42 Hakuho (14-1)
36 Kotoshogiku (11-4)
35 Kotooshu (9-6)
34 Baruto (11-4)
33 Kisenosato (10-5)
33 Myogiru (10-5)


The Bad

The bad rikishi are those who were guilty of multiple henkas. All of these rikishi deserve a lump of coal in their stockings this holiday season:
7  Tokitenku
5  Kimurayama

4  Kyokutenho
4  Takekaze
4  Yoshikaze


3  Aminishiki
3  Aran
3  Sagatsukasa


2  Daido
2  Kokkai
2  Miyabiyama
2  Sadanofuji


Any way you slice it, Tokitenku’s seven henkas was a lot. Kimurayama and Takekaze’s sumo looked especially bad too. The only real surprise on this list is Miyabiyama, who appears to have added the henka to his diet (clearly his only diet, I might add) of push down and slap down sumo.  

The Ugly

I accept that for some rikishi non-forward moving sumo makes sense from time to time. However, if you score below double digits on my system you are simply stinking up the joint. The names on this list should come as no surprise:
-1  Kimurayama

For the first time doing this we have a minus score (for a rikishi who didn’t withdraw with an injury). That’s not easy to do. If I wrestled and simply moved forward at the tachi-ai for 15 days I’d end up being thrown off the dohyo 15 times and produce (presumably) a score of 0. Or, to put that score in perspective, I’d have one more point than Kimurayama ended up with at Kyushu. That truly is shocking. I hope Kimurayama never emerges from Juryo again.
5  Kokkai

7  Tokitenku
7  Kyokutenho

7  Aran

Kokkai was clearly injured (although he isn’t any good even when healthy). Kyokutenho was ranked too high; at 35 he can’t compete with the big dogs any longer, but should be fine lower down in the rankings. Tokitenku and Aran display poor form and cynical sumo tournament after tournament and it’s a crying shame.

Kyushu 2011 Best

The Power Ranking system reveals the top 11 performances in terms of strength of opponents defeated for Kyushu. Why 11? Because, to quote Nigel Tufnel, “Well, it’s one louder, isn’t it? It’s not ten.” Or maybe it’s because I care ten percent more: you decide.

                         Strength                                    W-L          Previous
     Rikishi             W-L          Win %                   Record     Ranking

1.   Hakuho              145-17          89.5%                        14-1               (1)

2.   Baruto                120-27          81.6%                        11-4               (4)

3.   Kotoshogiku        95-58           62.0%                        11-4              (2)

4.   Toyonoshima      89-74           54.6%                          9-6               (10)

5.   Kakuryu                86-79           52.1%                        10-5              (6)

6.   Kisenosato           85-80           51.5%                        10-5              (3)  

6.   Harumafuji          85-79           51.8%                          8-7               (8)

6.   Goeido                 85-83           50.5%                          7-8               (NR)  

9.   Kotooshu             70-84           45.4%                          9-6               (NR)  

10. Tochinowaka      64-97           39.7%                          7-8               (NR)

11. Okinoumi            58-115         33.5%                          7-8               (7)


There really aren’t a lot of comments needed. No one is close to Hakuho. Although Baruto and Kotoshogiku finished with the same won-loss record it makes a huge difference if you are beating the bottom end of the jo’i or the top end of the sanyaku.

There is basically a four-way tie for 5 through 8 (and a three way tie for most wins at 6). I guess the basic comment here is that Kisenosato did not turn in a performance worthy of ozeki promotion, but that’s beating a dead horse at this point.

The big break in the rankings occurs at 9, Kotooshu, as he beat the bottom dwellers (or, to use the oft employed phrase, “rank and filers”) and lost to most of the good rikishi. His win on day 15 over Harumafuji was necessary for him to have a winning record for the year: 32-31-12. It must be ozeki pride that helped him pull that one out.
Tochinowaka makes this list for the first time. Get used to it, because the kid is good.

Henka Count in Kyushu 2011

Henka Count in Kyushu 2011
Total   Rikishi                        Day(s) in Which the Henka Occurred

7          Tokitenku                 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14

5          Kimurayama            2, 4, 5, 12, 15

4          Kyokutenho             6, 7, 8, 9

            Takekaze                  2, 4, 8, 13

            Yoshikaze                 7, 10, 14, 15

3          Aminishiki                2, 7, 13

            Aran                          4, 12, 13

            Sagatsukasa            5, 12, 15

2          Daido                       4, 5

            Kokkai                      9, 11

            Miyabiyama            11, 12

            Sadanofuji               5, 6

1          Asasekiryu              3

            Fujiazauma             11

            Myogiryu                 6

            Tochinoshin            12

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Post Kyushu 2011 Initial Comments

Kyushu 2011 now in the books, let’s take a look at the matters I pegged for attention before the basho.

  1. Who is going to win the Yusho?
Pre-basho prediction:  “The likelihood of Hakuho’s winning the yusho in Kyushu is considerably higher than ninety percent. Essentially, if Hakuho doesn’t get injured during the tournament he’s going to win it. Someday some rikishi will pose a real challenge to Hakuho and someday Hakuho won’t be able to win a tournament at will. However, that day will not come in November 2011. The yusho winner will be Hakuho.”

Post-basho analysis: Bingo. Hakuho’s dominance is the clearest thing about sumo at present. A monkey could have correctly predicted he’s win the basho, but in this case I did.
 

  1. Will Kisenosato win 11 (or more) and thus obtain promotion to ozeki?
Pre-basho prediction: “My guess is that the positives will outweigh the negatives and sumo will get the second (and younger and more talented) ozeki many in Japan clearly want. I’d take the over on Kisenosato’s winning at least 11 victories and getting promoted to ozeki for the new year. I wouldn’t bet the house on it though.”


Kisenosato looked very good in week one. After that, he just looked weak. Actually, to be fair, he looked bad in his wins – he pulled out a lucky win against Kotooshu after being dominated, and almost lost to both Tochinoshin and Gagamaru, inferior rikishi having bad tournaments – and he looked okay in his losses. The problem was there were just too many losses. Kisenosato only won 10 times, for a total of 32 wins over the last three tournaments. I had noted that “before Aki, he never (as in not once in 41 previous tournaments) won more than 11 victories when ranked at the top (in the sanyuku or jo’i). To ask him to do it twice in a row would seem to be a lot.” And it was.


The appropriate thing to do would have been to let Kisenosato reset in January, where he again would be carrying a win total of 22 going into the tournament. Kotoshogiku had to go through it a second time, so why not Kisenosato, especially when there already is a Japanese ozeki?

Well, because the Sumo Association decided otherwise, that’s why.

“Under the JSA's loosely defined guidelines, a total of 33 wins over three consecutive tournaments is the minimum requirement for a move up to ozeki. Kisenosato, who won his first Technique Prize, had only reached 32 ahead of his bout against Kotoshogiku.

The JSA officiating committee, nevertheless, decided to make an exception based on Kisenosato's consistently strong performances and his future potential. Kisenosato will become the second wrestler in as many tournaments to gain promotion to ozeki following Kotoshogiku who got the nod after the autumn meet in September.” http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/sports/news/20111127p2g00m0sp058000c.html

          Wow, you can get promoted to ozeki based on your “future potential?” Who knew? If that was the criteria they should have promoted Kisenosato back in 2008. Hmmm. If memory serves me correctly, there was once a yokozuna candidate who didn’t meet the critera for promotion but was promoted nevertheless based on his “future potential.” His name was Futahaguro. As I recall that one didn’t work out too well.

          I don’t blame Kisenosato; although he slightly underperformed in Kyushu he didn’t make this mess. Once again, the Sumo Association shows itself to be among the worst sports’ organizations in the world. Alright, more on this mess in another post.
 

  1. How will the rikishi newly promoted to the makuuchi division fare in their first tournament?

Pre-basho prediction:


A. Myogiryu: “I’m not saying Myogiryu is going to be another yokozuna. However, I predict that no later than 2013 he is going to be a mainstay in the sanyaku…. I’m looking forward to watching a very interesting and successful career.”

B. “I don’t see any of the other four newcomers having the same level of success, although I think Aoiyama certainly has the size to stay in the top division.”


C. “I also like Shohozan and think that, like Aoiyama he has the stuff to stick in the mankuuchi division.”


D. The other two newcomers (Tsurugidake, who is clearly only here because of the March banishments, and Sadanofuji) are at most borderline rikishi. I’m guessing their New Year’s destination is south, in 10 ryu-land.
 
Post-basho analysis:


Aki 2011 Rookie Comparison

Shikona                     W/L                Power            Percent         Forward Sumo

Myogiryu                  10-5               36-16             69%                33

Shohozan                 10-5               35-12             74%                32

Aoiyama                   11-4               32-12             72%                31

Sadanofuji                  8-7               22-17             56%                18

Tsurugidake               4-11             12-32             27%                16

Except for Tsurugidake, a remarkably successful rookie debut by this crop, with the three I tapped for success all posting double digit victories. Myogiryu achieved the highest power ranking, at 36, and displayed the most forward moving sumo, at 33. He also looked the best. I stand by my pre-basho remarks that he’ll have the best career and be a sanyuka mainstain no later than 2013. Time will tell, of course, but thusfar he delivered on his promise.


Aoiyama had one more win, and defeated Myogiryu in his head to head bout. Although his power ranking and forward moving sumo ranking are lower than Myogiryu’s, they are very close. He deservedly won the Fighting Spirit Prize.  

Shohozan’s performance was right up there with those of Myogiryu and Aoiyama in all the key categories. Nicely done.

Sadanofuji surprised me, and with a kachi koshi will not be returning to juryo in January. If you track his performance, however, you’ll see it is significantly lower than the other winning rookies. (A good forward moving sumo rating for a rikishi with 8 wins would be in the mid-20s; Sadanofuji’s 18 is an indication that his sumo wasn’t very good). This is the performance I got wrong, but as the chart shows, his hold on success is nebulous.


Tsurigidake. His one tournament in the makuuchi division can be directly traces to the expulsions from the earlier yaocho scandal. Enough said.

Overall, my prediction was correct for 4 out of 5 in Kyushu, and I still believe I correctly pegged Sadanofuji’s future career.

 4. Does Kotooshu still have enough left to remain an ozeki?

Pre-basho prediction:  I’m doubtful that Kotooshu can go kachi-koshi. Maybe he can pull it out and scrape by with 8 or even 9 victories. But the end is coming soon.”

Post-basho analysis: Well, I was wrong, sort of. Kotooshu did pull it out and scrape by with 9 victories. He even looked pretty good during the first week. The first rule in sports is you have to defeat the people who aren’t as good as you, and he did that.

However, he did just scrape by. His power raking coming into the tournament was 70.8, and his power ranking in Kyushu was 70. That simply isn’t a high enough level of performance to maintain the rank of ozeki over the long term. I still believe “the end is coming soon” will prove to be correct.

  1. What can we expect from Kotoshogiku?     
Pre-basho prediction: “I’m anticipating Kotoshogiku will fall into the 8 or 9 wins group, with perhaps 9 being more likely since Kyushu is friendly turf for him.”

Post-basho analysis: Kotoshogiku outperformed my prediction, starting out with 9 straight victories, and gathering 11 overall. He looked better than anyone not named Hakuho or Baruto and showed that despite a rather week run at ozeki he isn’t going to disgrace that name. (If that’s even possible after the last four or five years.) Plus, with Kisenosato elevated after an even weaker ozeki run, the debate over Kotoshogiku’s somewhat shaky credentials will quickly fade. A lovely debut ozeki showing – kudos for exceeding my prediction.

6.     Are there any other rikishi worth special attention?

Pre-basho prediction:

A.    “Perhaps not.”

B.    “For the elevator rikishi: elevator up for Kaisei and Wakakoyu; elevator down for Gagamaru and Aran.”

C.    “I’m hoping that the lumbering henka-clunker Kimurayama produces his fifth make kochi in a row (all would be from ranks14 M or lower, which surely would be a record) and we never have to see him in the makuuchi division again.”

D.   “I believe the end is near for Asasekiryu – he just doesn’t have it any more.”

E.     “Following him sometime next year should be Miyabiyama.”

F.     “On a somewhat sadder note, I think this is likely to be the final tournament for Takamisakari….”

Post-basho analysis:

A. I knew Tochinowaka was going to be good, but I didn’t expect him to be this good this soon. For his first time in the j’oi he did very well. Don’t let the fact that he made a make koshi fool you – his power ranking for Kyushu was 64, tenth best overall. The only reason he didn’t get kachi koshi was because both Kyokutenho and Aminishiki henka’d him and he lost those two matches. He’s talented enough that henka’s won’t fool him for long. He has a great body for sumo and displays a lot of heart. He’s already worthy of special attention, and I was wrong for not predicting it this basho.

B. “For the elevator rikishi: elevator up for Kaisei and Wakakoyu; elevator down for Gagamaru and Aran.”

                             Kyushu               Aki

Kaisei                    6-9                       4-11

Wakakoyu          12-3                      6-9

Gagamaru            2-13                  11-4

Aran                      4-11                    5-10

Technically I was correct on all four, but in reality Kaisei still looked awful, so I’ll take a three out of four on this one.

C. “I’m hoping that the lumbering henka-clunker Kimurayama produces his fifth make kochi in a row (all would be from ranks14 M or lower, which surely would be a record) and we never have to see him in the makuuchi division again.”

Let’s see just how poorly Kimurayama performed:

Shikona                     W/L                Power            Percent         Forward Sumo

Kimurayama                        4- 11              11-28             28%                -1

Yes, you are reading it correctly, Kimurayama produced a negative number for forward sumo, a new record. Five henkas and eight bouts with no forward motion (zeros) can do that. Kimurayama gets a special jeer for henka’ing 1-13 (and obviously hurt) Kokkai on day 15. Nothing becomes him as well as his leaving for juryo. Take your “junk” with you and don’t come back. Bulls-eye prediction.

D. “I believe the end is near for Asasekiryu – he just doesn’t have it any more.” 6-9 in Kyushu, his six make koshi in a row, and he yet again he looked bad. He’s likely to be at the very bottom of the makuuchi division in January, and the end is even nearer.

E. and F. Miyabiyama and Takamisakari (in juryo) both produced kachi kosh, much to my surprise. Their sumo wasn’t any good though. And I still think 2012 will be the last year for both of them.